Showing posts with label National Constitution Bills. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Constitution Bills. Show all posts

Monday, December 2, 2013

Nationals, not expats, should be running Ok Tedi

Source: The National, Monday December 2nd, 2013
IT is with great sadness that I write on behalf of the silent majority that have been forced to leave Ok Tedi Mining Ltd (OTML) against their will by year’s end.
Prime Minister Peter O’Neill promised that his government would listen to the petition submitted by the 2,000-plus skilled workers and that no national employee would lose his/her job, but instead create more jobs.
This is not happening.
In the name of cost-cutting and a smaller mine operation going forward, the company has laid off 40% of its national workforce, but no expatriate positions have been made redundant.
The company is recruiting a lot of expatriates, mostly to fill managerial and senior positions vacated by nationals.
Many consultants are flooding in and a lot of contracts worth millions of US dollars are being raised to bring in more consultants and contract companies to drain the wealth from Ok Tedi.
Is the prime minister aware of what is going on and is he concerned for his fellow countrymen and women?
Does he have plans to secure their welfare and their jobs?
Ok Tedi is 100% PNG-owned and every Papua New Guinean should be happily working and benefitting from this great mine.
The government needs to intervene immediately and sack managing director Nigel Parker and his senior management.
I write this in hope that the prime minister and his office will take immediate action to save our national employees’ jobs.
We have been running this mine for over 30 years and it is time we manage our own affairs and be truly independent.
We have enough qualified technical people from engineers, designers, miners, operators, welders, fitters as well as managers.
Let Ok Tedi be run by Papua New Guineans from 2014.
We can do it and we are prepared to take Ok Tedi forward.
Patriotic Mine Slave
OTML T­­­­­­­­­abubil

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Ok Tedi nationalisation not OK, says PNG ex-leader

by:ROWAN CALLICK, ASIA-PACIFIC EDITOR
September 23, 201312:00AM
FORMER Papua New Guinea prime minister and central bank governor Mekere Morauta yesterday warned that last week's nationalisation of Ok Tedi Mining presented dangers for the country by increasing the perception of sovereign risk. The rapidly introduced legislation cancelled the shares of Ok Tedi's 63 per cent owner, a trust named PNG Sustainable Development Program, and issued new shares to the government, giving it 100 per cent control. Sir Mekere, the chairman of both Ok Tedi and PNGSDP, said the legislation "would undermine investor confidence at a time when a number of very large investments are on the horizon".
He said the bills "should have been circulated widely and debated fully, not kept secret and bulldozed through in one day". The nationalisation debate is likely to shift to the courts of Port Moresby and of Singapore, where PNGSDP is domiciled.
The PNG Treasurer, Don Polye, revealed last week that the budgeted fiscal deficit for 2013 of 7.2 per cent of gross domestic product -- following a succession of balanced or near-balanced budgets -- was expected to deteriorate to about 7.7 per cent.
He attributed this in part to falling commodity prices, and in part to large corrupt payments for "ghost workers" -- staff who have died or moved, or collect more than one salary -- on government payrolls.
It remains unclear how the government will pay for the takeover. The share of the mine owned by PNGSDP alone is valued at the equivalent of 55 per cent of this year's originally budgeted deficit.
Sir Mekere also said that "it is wrong to leave it to politicians to decide if compensation is to be paid (for expropriated shares), and the amount".
This will be decided by Prime Minister Peter O'Neill, according to the legislation, acting on cabinet advice.
Sir Mekere said: "Such decisions need to be taken according to clearly defined, established processes with full accountability and transparency."
He said that the Western Province villages in the vicinity of the mine, which signed the Community Mine Continuation Agreement in return for a flow of dividends and other benefits via PNGSDP, "have been tricked by a ruthless Prime Minister focused on his own ambitions".
Sir Mekere said: "Where we can fight, we will fight. Why are we expropriating assets from our own people?"

Friday, September 20, 2013

State to Own Ok Tedi Mining Ltd

State to own Ok Tedi
House passes Bill to hold 100 per cent stake in mine


By ISAAC NICHOLAS

PARLIAMENT has passed amendments to the OK Tedi Mining Agreement for the State to have 100 per cent ownership of the OK Tedi mine.
The move by Parliament also ended a war of words between Prime Minister Peter O’Neill and OTML chairman Sir Mekere Morauta over the issue.
When making the amendments, Parliament passed a new tenth Supplementary Agreement that will result in the cancellation of PNG Sustainable Development Program (PNGSDP) shares in OTML and the issue of new shares to the State.
On the commencement date, all ordinary shares held by PNGSDP in the share capital of OTML shall be cancelled and cease to exist.
More than 122 million new fully-paid shares in the share capital of OTML will be issued to the State.
These shares are free of any encumbrances, charges or equitable interests.
The PNGSDP will undergo a major restructure of its operations to ensure its funds is exclusively for the benefit of the people of Western Province.
The new Bill also provided that any person who has any choice in action or right to pursue or enforce legal proceedings against or in relation to BHP in relation in connection with the operation of the OK Tedi mine will now have their full rights restored.
The effect of this is that individuals will have all their legal rights restored and are free to pursue any new or former actions against BHP.
The Mining (OK Tedi Ninth Supplementary Agreement) (Amendment) Bill 2013 was introduced by Prime Minister Peter O’Neill and was passed 62-0 votes.
Several MPs, including Sir Michael Somare, Garry Juffa, Tobias Kulang and Sam Basil abstaining by walking out of the chambers before the vote was taken.
Sir Michael during debate warned of the negative image this kind of legislation would have on future investors who were thinking of investing in the country.
Mr Kulang said legacy issues were against the State in the government’s failure to manage their own state enterprises.
He also called on Mr O’Neill to give a break-down of shareholding between the landowners, provincial government and the State.
Mr O’Neill, when presenting the amendment said this was a very important Bill to be introduced to the House.
“No one can sit in this House and excuse BHP for the destruction it had caused. But that is what the Government under Sir Mekere did in 2001,” Mr O’Neill said.
“They came up with a deal that would grant total immunity to BHP from prosecution for environmental damage or compensation, in exchange for a program company set up outside of PNG, and still controlled by BHP.”
The company was set up in Singapore, called the PNGSDP.
“Off course Sir Mekere now sits at the top of PNGSDP and Ok Tedi Mining Ltd, as chairman, courtesy of his friends at BHP when he retired.”
 
Source: The National, Thursday September 19th, 2013
GRAND Chief Sir Michael Somare warned parliamentarians yesterday not to rush the Ok Tedi Mine Continuation Amendment Bill before he walked out of the chamber when a vote was about to be taken.
Sir Michael when debating on the bill had warned MPs not to rush into making amendments and laws that would give the wrong signal to the international community.
“I see the mood and emotions of parliament,” the former prime minister said.
“I support the idea but we must understand (that) today the action of this parliament will give a wrong signal to the international community that we are moving towards the nationalisation of all resource ownership.
“If there is a problem, the prime minister should call for dialogue. You can’t do it (through) legislations.”
He said Ok Tedi had made a lot of money for the country.
Sir Michael, who was interjected through a point of order, said what he said was for the good of the nation.
He said the action would affect the economy and the trust the country had in the international community as a destination of investment.
“I do not oppose, yes people discuss what the people understand,” he said.
“Paias Wingti, Julius Chan and I are around. No one listened to us but I warn you young MPs that things do not change overnight. You must be careful.
“We are respectful people. We hear one side of the story here but we have not heard the other side of the story.
“For the benefit of PNG ... think before doing it.”
Source: The National, Thursday September 19th, 2013
By MALUM NALU and JEFFREY ELAPA
SIR Mekere Morauta has vowed to fight tooth-and-nail to defend the Western people’s US$1.6 billion (K3.97 billion) share in the Ok Tedi Mining
Ltd (OTML) from being taken away by the Government.
Parliament yesterday passed the Mining (Ok Tedi Tenth Supplemental Agreement) Bill 2013 with 62 votes to nil to give the Government full ownership of the giant mine.
Sir Mekere, the PNG Sustainable Development Program (PNGSDP) Ltd chairman, also accused Prime Minister Peter O’Neill of planning to control the US$1.4 billion in PNGSDP’s longterm fund which was being kept in Singapore.
But a spokesman for O’Neill yesterday said the people of Western, through their elected leaders, had voted in Parliament to approve the State’s 100% ownership of the mine.
Sir Mekere yesterday said despite the Government having the overwhelming majority to pass legislation to take control of the mine, the PNGSDP, as custodian of the Western people, would not give it up without a fight.
“I can only defend,” he told a media conference.
“Under our constitution, the state can expropriate private assets if it is in the national interest but a fair compensation has to be paid.
“He (O’Neill) has to convince us that it’s in the national interest. If it is in the national interest, he has to pay. That’s under the constitution.
“I hope he’s the last prime minister to expropriate his own people’s assets without compensation.”
Sir Mekere said O’Neill had the PNGSDP firmly in his sight.
“He’s not only trying to take US$1.6 billion by expropriating these shares, he wants to take control of US$1.4 billion in the long-term fund, saved from past dividends for expenditure in future after mine closure.
“He wants to take control of that as well as start spending now. It doesn’t make sense to me. Why is he so unkind to the people of Western?”
In yesterday’s sitting, O’Neill said the transfer of 100% shareholdings in OTML was in the best interests of the people of Western and PNG.
“According to the Ninth Supplementary Agreement, BHP gifted its shares in the mine to PNGSDP. This meant that PNGSDP held 63% of the shares in Ok Tedi and the State held the remainder. The intention of this was that the mine would effectively be owned by the State. The mine would belong to the people of Western and its proceeds would be used for their benefit.
“However, PNGSDP has not operated as intended and BHP has continued to have a hand in PNGSDP. This is wrong. We are a sovereign country and can be trusted to manage our own resources and affairs. The State must be able to act on its own accord.
“It is time to review the operation of PNGSDP.
“The state is not taking these shares – it will be providing some compensation to PNGSDP.”
O’Neill said regardless of the amount of compensation, the people of Western would not be disadvantaged as the dividends from OK Tedi would be used to fund development projects under the Western Province Development Plan.
“We are simply returning an asset that was gifted to the people of Western back to them, so that they can fully benefit from it, and begin to rebuild their lives.”
Source: The National, Thursday September 19th, 2013
OK Tedi mine landowners can now pursue legal actions against BHP in relation to environmental damage caused by the mining operation.
It follows Parliament’s amendment of the Immunity Act 2001 yesterday.
The bill, tabled by Prime Minister Peter O’Neill, received overwhelming support from MPs. They repealed the Ninth Supplemental Agreement on Ok Tedi where all parties undertook to waive any rights or action against BHP Biliton and the State in relation to environmental damage caused by the mining operations at Ok Tedi.
O’Neill said the mine caused a lot of environmental damage which the State and the people did not expect.
He said BHP, “hell-bent on the profits”, ignored it and allowed the disposal of waste into the Fly River, causing extensive environmental damage which affected many lives.
“No one can sit in this house and excuse BHP for the destruction it had caused. But that is what the government, under Sir Mekere Morauta, did in 2001,” the prime minister said.
“They came up with a deal that would grant total immunity to BHP from prosecution for environmental damage or compensation, in exchange for a programme company (PNGSD) set up outside of PNG in Singapore, and still controlled by BHP.
“Of course Sir Mekere now sits at the top of PNGSDP, and Ok Tedi Mining Ltd as chairman, courtesy of his friends at BHP when he retired.”
He said the Bill would remove this waiver for BHP Biliton meaning that landowners or affected parties could bring any action or enforce any right against it.
“The government in 2001 made a very bad decision in granting immunity to a corporate giant, preventing its own people from exercising their right under law to sue for permanent damages done to their environment and their livelihood.
“This doesn’t happen anywhere else. Companies and corporate entities own up to their responsibilities and pay compensation,” he said.
Source: The National, Thursday September 19th, 2013
NORTH Fly MP Boka Kondra thanked parliamentarians for wiping away the tears and bearing the burden of the people of Western by passing a bill to protect their interest.
Kondra, an Ok Tedi mine landowner, said the people had suffered because of the arrogance of BHP by dumping waste into the Fly River which had been a concern for a long time.
“I speak on behalf of the people of Western and the provincial government and say thank you to government for wiping away the tears of our people,” he said.
“The lady that we got married to (referring to BHP) although exited 10 years ago was still in control and was not good.
“The time has come for her to go.”
Kondra said since 1979, no development had taken place.
“We have been crucified for the benefit of economical benefit by creating indemnity.”
He said many people had died while others were affected by the pollution.
“Some students sent to New Zealand went through some tests which found that their blood contained metals.”
Middle Fly MP Roy Biyama said the people had suffered enough with many experiencing the effect of the pollution of their river system.
Others who took part in the debate and supported the bill were Sumkar MP Ken Fairweather, Middle Ramu MP Tommy Tomscoll and Environment and Conservation Minister John Pundari
Sir Mekere: Bill is a grab for money, power

By TODAGIA KELOLA

Chairman of PNG Sustainable Development Program Sir Mekere Morauta has described a legislation passed by Parliament as a blatant grab for power and money, and would have serious negative consequences for the nation and for Western Province in particular.
And he has vowed on behalf of PNGSDP to examine the law and see what options they have.
“We have a duty to the people of Western Province who own the mine and receive the dividends paid to PNGSDP in the form of social and economic development to protect their rights and their assets,” Sir Mekere said.
“I guarantee them that we will do all that we can.”
Earlier in the day before Parliament passed the legislation, Sir Mekere held a news conference and reiterated his statement that the decision by Prime Minister Peter O’Neill to expropriate Ok Tedi Mining Limited without compensation was “nothing more than stealing an asset” from the people of Western Province.
Sir Mekere said PNGSDP would do “everything in its power to prevent expropriation without compensation” and was ready to take legal action if the legislation was brought to Parliament.
“Those shares are owned by the people of Western Province, not PNGSDP,” he said.
“PNGSDP is merely the custodians of them.
The Prime Minister is legally and morally obliged to pay a full and fair price if he is so determined to get his hands on them.”
Sir Mekere said the company would stand with the people of Western Province who had voiced their strong opposition to the government’s plans.
“PNGSDP has a duty to protect Western Province people’s assets and will do so with all necessary legal means,” he said.
“Stealing an asset worth approximately K2 billion to the people of Western Province plus their annual K450 million share of the Ok Tedi dividends is not acceptable legally or morally. It is unconstitutional as well. I also fear that this is just the first step – I hope he does not want to get his hands on PNGSDP itself and the $US1.4 billion in the long-term fund.”
Sir Mekere was shocked by the PM’s announcement on EMTV and said he had spent the past six months trying to negotiate with the PM for a fair deal on the Western Province’s 63.4 per cent shareholding held by PNGSDP.
Mr O’Neil on Tuesday slammed Sir Mekere, saying the PNGSDP had mixed success in its various programs and its failures were notable for an organisation that was “growing like a bureaucracy” in PNG.
“We know he (Sir Mekere) represents BHP on that particular board, he does not represent the people of Papua New Guinea, he does not represent the people of Western Province. He does not represent Western Provincial Government in any shape whatsoever,” Mr O’Neill said.
“His interest is very clear, he represents foreign interests, he represents BHP – now our Government is trying to correct the mistakes of the past.
“We are trying to ensure that there is transparency and accountability in the way that OK Tedi is managed, in the way that PNGSDP is managed and it must be done for the interest of the people of Western province and the people of Papua New Guinea as a whole.
“The assets of OK Tedi and the assets of PNG Development Program is not Sir Mekere’s, it is not BHP’s – it belongs to the people of Western Province and it is the people of PNG who rightfully own those assets.
“That is why it is important that we manage them in consultation with our people.”
Mining Act upsets Opposition

The Opposition has raised concern that the Government is tabling amendments to the Mining Act to give the State “maximum power” to determine the future of the Ok Tedi Mine and the PNGSDP.
In a statement the Opposition said, “We are very concerned that the Government is setting a very dangerous precedence here by trying to legislate to take control of private companies.”
They said the move was a very negative signal to the investment communities and will create a lot of unnecessary anxiety.
“We are very concerned that this Government is using its numerical strength and the immunity of the amended Section 145 to slowly become dictatorial.”
The statement read that this was what the Opposition had been trying to warn the people of this country when it raised issues on the amendments to Section 145 on Motions of vote of no confidence.
It said, “This is a very dangerous trend for this country and the people must pressure and encourage their local members of parliament to use their conscience to scrutinise such bills.
“The opposition is also concerned that certain pertinent questions remain unanswered with the bill.” The points raised include:
* The Prime Minister has not clearly defined what is going to be the new shareholding structure once the Ok Tedi mining is taken over.
* Will the current 63 per cent shareholding by the people of Western Province increase or decrease?
* How much shareholding is the state planning to take? will it remain at 37 per cent or increase?
* What happens to the $US1.4 billion held in Singapore by PNGSDP for the people of Western Province for future generations? Who takes control of these funds when the take over takes place?
* What is the corporate structure that the government will use to take over the operations of the OTML? Will there be political appointment at the board and management?
* Have they consulted the people about this move?
The Opposition said that until these pertinent questions were answered, they were very suspicious of the Government’s move and would like to request for more clarity from the government. This is a very important matter especially for the people of Western Province who have suffered from the bad decisions of past governments.
Kondra: Economic independence vital

By MELISSA MARTIN

Papua New Guinea must be economically-independent and self-reliant, says Minister for Tourism Arts and Culture and North Fly MP Boka Kondra.
Mr Kondra, who was in his electorate for a visit last weekend, said PNG was rich in natural resources but does not possess the “buying power” and we are still poor on our own land.
“We must start to think, talk, plan and act positively towards being economically independent,” he said.
“I urge Papua New Guineans not to be lazy; we must spend money wisely and use it on starting small businesses or Small Medium Enterprises which the O’Neill-Dion Government is embarking on.”
Mr Kondra said the Ok Tedi Mining Limited (OTML) will be taken over by the people of Western Province and the Government as of January 1, 2014.
“More than 63 per cent shares of PNG Sustainable Development Program will be diverted back to the people of Western Province and the Government,” he said.
Mr Kondra said the government was ready to overthrow the supplementary agreement number nine with developer BHP.
He said this in response to the community mine continuation agreement (CMCA) leaders’ recent media reports opposing the Government’s move to take over PNGSDP.
Mr Kondra urged them to calm down and cooperate with the Government to take over the mine because it was for the interest for the people of Western Province and PNG.
“What the Government is doing is clear; it wants to give ownership back to the people and not to be deprived on our own land by foreign companies,” Mr Kondra said.
“PNGSDP is BHP’s, it is not ours, how much percentages do we as landowners or people of Western Province own?”
He said said OTML would be the first to be taken over by the people and the Government and it will be a model mine for others to follow.
“The National Executive Council will come here to sign new agreements with us,” he said


Related News Link
BHP Says PNG Removing Ok Tedi Protections Raises Sovereign Risk
PNG's Government takes Full ownership of Ok Tedi Mine
PNG Government takes 100% ownership of OK Tedi Mine
Ok Tedi Mine Immunity Removed
PNG Takes Over Ok Tedi Mine
PNG Government takes full ownership of Ok Tedi Mine
The FAUSTIAN CONTRACT Between BHP and PNG

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Ipatas backs agreement

Source: The National, Wednesday August 7th, 2013
 
ENGA Governor Peter Ipatas has backed the asylum seekers’ deal signed with Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, saying PNG stands to gain greatly from it.
“Critics of this deal are ignoring the immediate benefits of the deal, and the opportunities it will open up for Papua New Guinea,” he said.
“Immediately, Manus will get developments projects funded by the Australian and PNG governments, that it would not otherwise get for some time.
“Manus is isolated, and often forgotten, so this deal is providing opportunities that come with hosting the processing centre”
Ipatas said Australia had always stood by PNG when it was in need, so it was right to accept a request from them to help address a growing global problem of human smuggling and illegal migration.

Friday, April 20, 2012

Sir Arnold fights changes in law

Source: The National, Friday 20th April 2012

FORMER chief justice Sir Arnold Amet has filed a Supreme Court reference challenging the constitutional validity of the Supreme Court (Amendment) Bill passed by parliament on Tuesday.
The Madang MP said in a joint media briefing with opposition leader Dame Carol Kidu that the government had removed the inherent powers the people of Papua New Guinea vested in the Supreme Court.
Sir Arnold said the government was undermining the Supreme Court and its action
was fundamentally flawed and unconstitutional.
“It is a major amendment that deals with the powers and functions of the judiciary that was passed by voices only. It should be passed by a vote.”

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Open seats cut back to 89

Source: The National, Thursday 23rd Febuary 2012

PARLIAMENT has unanimously passed legislative amendments to reduce the Open seats from 110 to 89 in accordance with the Constitution.
Prime Minister Peter O’Neill who introduced the second reading of the bill got the support (79-0 votes) to make amendments to the organic law on national and local level government elections.
He said the amendment was a follow-up to the previous amendment to retain the provincial seats for governors
standing in the 2012 election.
O’Neill said the constitution, when it was amended in view of removing the provincial seats, also increased the open seats from 89 to 110.
He said the amendments would ensure there were no less than 89 open electorates and no more than 120 open electorates.
He said once the population increased and there was a need for more representation, new open seats could be created

Monday, December 19, 2011

Women’s Bill a historical milestone

Source: Feature, Post Courier, December 19, 2011

Women Today - COMMENTARYBy Dr Thomas Webster Director, National Research Institute
The passing of the Equality and Participation Bill to guarantee women in Papua New Guinea up to 22 seats in parliament, one seat in each province after the June 2012 elections, is a historical milestone and a moment of triumph that should be celebrated and supported by every Papua New Guinean.
The current bill indeed guarantees that up to 22 electorates will be reserved for women, however laws are yet to be tabled in parliament to determine the boundaries of the new seats.
This is essential because without these laws in place before 2012, intending women candidates will not be able to run for elections. Both these bills require the support of all Papua New Guineans, especially through their electoral representatives.
There is a pressing need for the Government of PNG to schedule two votes which are needed to determine the boundaries for electorates guaranteed to women.
The first of the boundary laws is expected to be tabled when parliament resumes on December 6 and the second may occur in April next year according to Dame Carol Kidu, an advocate of the bill.
In over 36 years and since Papua New Guinea gained independence, only four women have been successfully elected to parliament.
This year, Dame Carol Kidu, is the only woman who sits in parliament. It is our hope that the bill is realized and that the input and efforts of more women in parliament will complement the efforts of fellow male politicians.
This would ensure that Papua New Guinea can benefit immensely from a well-represented parliament that looks at the broader interests of all Papua New Guineans at the highest level of decision-making which will affect the whole country.
As Prime Minister Peter O’ Neill stated in his introduction of the bill to parliament: “Only with the input of women will PNG go on and thrive to become a great nation.”
We welcome the bill with great optimism and awareness that women would bring a whole new perspective to the floor of parliament. Indeed, more women in parliament would add some new dimensions to the policy agenda.
There are development issues to be highlighted and social indicators that need to be addressed including maternal mortality, infant mortality and gender-based violence, to name a few. Through the reserved seats, womenfolk then get to become equal partners in the development process.
While having said this, the NRI is of course also fully cognisant of the views expressed by the wider public against the merits of the Bill. Some opponents have labeled the bill an expensive exercise saying that the extra seats would incur costs of up to K 25 million that could otherwise be spent on “needy” areas. Thus, the extra seats reserved for women are, for them, an extravagant exercise.
A particularly strong and persuasive argument by opponents of the Bill, is that women have not been deprived of their rights to contest parliamentary seats and therefore, they should not be given a free ride by being reserved 22 of the highest seats in the land.
The issue however, is that given the election trend in PNG for more than three decades, waiting on polling results to produce female representatives in Parliament would be a very futile exercise.
Papua New Guinea’s electoral behavior, imbued in a strong male-centered political culture, is not likely to change the trend anytime soon.
The male dominance is partly a cultural factor where men are considered natural leaders and decision makers. It is also valid to say that male dominance is very much a byproduct of the manner in which society is changing.
While politics in developed countries is often vilified as a dull vocation, it conveniently serves as a means for individuals to acquire greater prosperity and social status, particularly in developing countries like Papua New Guinea.
The stark reality for Papua New Guinea therefore, is the case that stiff electoral competition mainly among male candidates for access to the state institutions is what ultimately causes womenfolk to be under-represented in Parliament.
Electoral data show that female candidacy for national elections have showed a small marginal increase since 1975, out of which there were three female parliamentarians: Nahau Rooney, Josephine Abaijah and Carol Kidu.
That is a serious asymmetry by anyone’s definition against the 50 percent female segment of the national population.
While welcoming the Equality and Participation Bill, the least among the issues that parliamentarians should concern themselves with is the costs of the 22 extra seats. The real challenge however, is the need to demarcate a clear sphere of responsibility for the women parliamentarians.
As it stands, the 109 MPs is already a crowded field for the limited number of ministries and perks and privileges to be passed around. There is also the danger in relation to possible duplication of responsibilities with existing open and provincial Members.
Finding the right political equilibrium is therefore paramount for the effective and productive collaboration of both men and women in PNG politics and for the success of the Government of Papua New Guinea.

Recent Comments

PNG Live News Headlines